Skip to main content

Why is Even Trump Unable to Tell Us About What the Intelligence Services Have Found?

Why is Trump unable to tell the people about the systemic problem that has been going on since he won the administration? 

For the past 20 years, successive administrations have deliberately tried to throw the republic into the ground and set the foundations for a new regime, in spite of the democratic process. The Democrats, ironically, seem to have been the largest perpetrator but what if the Republicans have contributed enough to make them equally complicit?

Is it because that news would be so devastating to the country that Pres. Trump cannot tell the people in plain terms for fear of triggering a nationwide outrage big enough to cause significant disturbance which will run out of control? 

This is purely speculative I have no evidence to support it, except for the litany of it across the media. But that is not proof obviously, given the appalling state of mis and disinformation the news services and all governments have been giving us since the pandemic and before.

What might this corruption be that Trump implies was put in place under the Biden administration? A system-wide attempt of sedition, which was made up to change the way the country worked against the democratic wishes of the people? Which was so bad for the nation, that for Trump to have exposed it to the people would have been more damaging than not telling them. 

The Epstein files being meaningless in comparison. And has it got everything to do with seditionary activity to crush the nation of America and change its fundamental purpose and possibly its constitution by anti democratic proxy? That is, to invite foreign invaders in the form of open borders mass migration - the migrants are not to blame they're merely being exploited like cannon fodder. Or to deliberately allow foreign invaders to peak into the internal secret processes, files and offices of the nation. Or to effectively launder money at high scale through the NGO's in support of all this and a raft of other grotesque policies. Is this what it all is at gigantic scale?

Is it possible that what we've been told by Trump about this so far, and it might be untrue, is a tiny surface scratch of what Biden, Obama and Bush, maybe even Clinton probably, have been up to for 30 years. The scale of it being geometrically greater than even Trump is able to say publicly with safety. I remember Mr. Musk saying "if I tell you what it is, they will kill me". Was he lying?

For the past 20 years, successive administrations have deliberately tried to throw the republic into the ground and set the foundations for a new regime, in spite of the democratic process. The Democrats, ironically, seem to have been the largest perpetrator but what if the Republicans have contributed enough to make them equally complicit?

And what if its true, that in spite of all allegations against Trump, he is trying to save America, from all this, for the people? 

Who knows. Who can know any more. Do the people care enough to want to know? All I do know is that I know quite a few people personally who would be happy to sacrifice other people in large numbers, to see their cause make it. They are proud members of the mainstream party's.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more