Skip to main content

The Archbishop of York Makes Some Good Points on Reform and Mass Migration

Stephen Cottrell, the Archbishop of York, also standing in for Canterbury too has been in the press: Archbishop criticises Reform's Farage over 'knee-jerk' UK asylum plans. He's saying:

  • The Reform party's mass deportation policy will cause more problems than it solves
  • Reform have nothing that will deal with the underlying root causes anyway
  • The left are doubling down to maintain a dubious narrative to undermine proper dialogue
  • The right, in his terms - Islam, are not interested in the values of the west(whatever they might be)
The biggest surprise for me is that someone in a high seat is finally making a bold stand against the narrative by pointing out that Islam, at the core, typifies Nationalism*1. Yet the left, who use the racist and fascist card on a whim*2, are saying nothing about it curiously. One has to assume that some nationalists are more equal than others.

Such is the nature of Nationalism, which we can see playing out strongly here.

What's even more surprising is everyone else, who are neither left wing or islamic, often get called 'the far right' or 'racist' as a political slur, are not pointing it out either! Its just like Israel and the Jews not pointing out how their own civil rights are being trampled on by the left. Very strange. 

Notes:
  1. I'm not saying that Nationalism is a good or bad thing, that Islam is right or wrong for being a nationalist ideology or that something should or should not be done about it. I am saying it is what it is.
  2. What language will we have left to use to convey meaning under extreme difficulty when a de facto fascist or racist appears to take over I wonder - the wolf cried long ago?

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...