The Family and the Social Organisation Cannot Be Undermined. To try to bring multicultures together, inevitably will lead to conflict no matter what you do about it. But there is an alternative way of thinking about this which can bring humanity together and it's not Jesus, though that would be a significant aid. Will we start thinking about it though. Have we developed the wisdom yet to be able to think about it at all?
This YouTube: How Family Structure Drives Ideology, triggered a shift in the way I think about all this. Largely thanks to my ignorance until now. Harmony between people's is about family as well as ideology politics and religion.
Simply by pointing out how different are not only the organisation of differing societies and religions, but also the structure of families within and alongside them, it tells me, that until as humans we have risen to new heights of wisdom through a paradigm shift in how we all think about life and death, there is no way on this earth that any of the differing multicultures can successfully be brought together.
But it's more than that. It's that if we cannot achieve these new heights, we absolutely should try to avoid doing it for the sake of our descendants. Because we're clearly not ready for it yet until we've risen from the dead and have been cured of our blindness. And by trying to push through multiculturism anyway will harm our descendants so much more than we can ever see.
And even more than that, if one of these multicultures tries to force itself nationalistically onto another culture then the defending culture has every right under God to defend itself by any means whatsoever. Because they will be defending against the wrong to protect our descendants. A noble cause above all others.
By saying this, I don't mean that the West has every right to defend itself, nor do I mean that say Islam has the right to defend itself, nor the Jews, nor the anarchists, nor democrats. What I mean is that the any and every defending culture has every right to defend itself and it is that societies first duty to it's descendants, for the reasons set out above - the alternative will be worse if it does not defend itself, not just for the defenders but also for the nationalistic attacker in the end, because the whole world will be harmed by it.
Following is a dialogue with a friend with more rationale. Do not get me wrong. I am not saying one culture is better than another culture. I am saying all cultures are as good as one another or as bad as one another. It all depends on what that culture makes of itself. And if it tries to defeat another culture in any way by conquest, colonialism or insurrection, that is not doing it for the good and it will cause our descendants to suffer.
[28/09, 12:26] Robin Smith: That YouTube above on family structures is very interesting. You should watch it cuz it's told me a lot more than I used to know about some of the what we would consider grotesque things that going on in this country are accepted and have always been accepted by many of these other countries they're trying to shift onto this country
[28/09, 12:27] Robin Smith: I can't think of any reason that the state would try to shift these non-compatible family structures into each other. Other than to exploit those people. It must be that reason. What else could it be but ignorance and selfishness - which is what I mean. Exploitation by ignorance and selfishness.
[28/09, 12:31] Robin Smith: It's more of 'The Prizm'. We see child sex and incest in the same way as they see gay relationship and transgender cult. We both see their the others grotesque features as a direct result of their bad family and social organisation. And likewise, they feel the same about us. And never the twain shall meet while we remain selfish and ignorant.
[28/09, 12:31] Robin Smith: And there is a way we could work or live together with these different families and social structures, but that would mean a paradigm shift where we dropped all of our beliefs about how families and society should work. See Thomas Khun for this
[28/09, 12:32] Robin Smith: And if we cannot reach those heights then we should never try and force them together because it will inevitably lead to conflict. The forcing together itself will be responsible for creating the conflict.
[28/09, 12:34] Robin Smith: Under normal conditions, this should all be okay because each individual society with its own family structure will just get along as best as it can without impacting anybody else. And only needs enough power to defend itself from Invasion of other family structures. Otherwise known as patriotism, which is not nationalistic at all in any way whatsoever. It is merely defending the family. And it is not forcing itself onto another family.
[28/09, 12:34] Robin Smith: But where one of these Family-Based images or belief systems tries to dominate the world and forces itself onto another family and social structure to change to their own, then that is absolutely the reason to defend against them at all costs because the alternative will be much worse. Given they cannot ever work together without inevitable conflict.
[28/09, 12:35] Robin Smith: This applies both to the West and to the East, to Christianity and to Islam, to Judaism and Islam and to Iran and to America, and so on and so on. If the family is different, they should never be forced onto each other. If all the society has to do is encourage people to new heights of wisdom and remain in the hope they will take that pathway. Any other intervention of the state and of government will be inherently unjust snd set up a vicious spiral where our descendants are severely harmed far more than they would otherwise.