Skip to main content

Melanie Phillips’ Recent Far Right Thug Smear of Tommy Robinson Is Classic Professional Rivalry. It’s a Pity Because Phillips Has an Excellent Record Until Now. They Should Meet up and See Where Their Worldviews Intersect. And Make Fruit.

See here for an interesting talk with Grok on the system wide cognitive dissonnance surrounding Tommy Robinson and how Melanie Phillips of The Times of London seems to have got herself caught up on the wrong side of it all:

My Grok chat starts off typically aping the mainstream narrative with the inevitable circular reasoning going nowhere. The chat asks why Phillips, in her far right thug smear piece has failed to pursue Robinson in her usual professional, evidence based way, instead smearing him as a far right thug full on mainstream style. This was a shock to me given I follow her closely because she is so good on the absurd Palestinian narrative.

For me her invalid smear cut her credibility by 50% immediately. If she failed here, where else has she failed? She failed to do her usual excellent research and citations, particularly how she totally missed the recent Gaele Joly interview for French mainstream TV with Mr. Robinson debunking everything with clarity. That interview was a real psycho-analytical eye opener for narrative possession if you want to see how a belief system can take over minds without those possessed even knowing about it. Real Jung stuff.

After some scrutiny, to be fair to Grok, it eventually reaches more central ground with an analysis which paves the way for more authentic dialogue in the future.

After several years curing myself of my own my own cognitive dissonnance against Mr. Robinson's political mission, it's clear to me personally almost no one, in the whole world, has given Mr Robinson a fair hearing. Yet everyone is convinced they've done due diligence merely by listening to what they've been told to believe about it, without actually listening to the man himself. Even judges can fall into this trap of the collective psyche. It's epidemic in the political economy and crypto worlds. 

These days Robinson is articulate and very well able to make his message abundantly clear to the layman and professional intelligentsia alike. So there's no reason for Phillips not to give him an opportunity to talk. Unless, she really is jealous of him professionally. But has the man not already done enough?

I'm at the courts again tomorrow where everything will be summed up and a verdict given. At lunch where he does a public interview I'm going to ask Mr. Robinson to attempt to engage with Phillips at some point. It's possible to scramble through the barrage of cameras because the mainstream media do not care if they get a piece out of Robinson so won't put up much resistance. I noticed when close up today it would be easy to push past them and ask directly. 

Let's give it a go. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more