Skip to main content

Being Far Right is a Protected Characteristic. And It's Been Tested As So in Court.

Being far right, even though Robinson denies that, is now a protected characteristic. As much as being white, male and heterosexual. There's now precedence for it. 

So if activist NGO's and so on abuse it in that way in the future will they be liable for prosecution, equally to all other protected characteristics?

Court transcript of the ruling : 

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/R-v-Stephen-Lennon.pdf

"45. I must address two questions namely: (i) was the purpose of the stop for the statutory purpose 
set out in para 2(1) of Sch.7? and (ii) did your protected characteristics have a significant 
influence on the decision to stop? These are separate questions, and each must be asked. 
If there is evidence of unlawful discrimination, it is for the Crown to satisfy me so I am sure 
there was no unlawful discrimination before a conviction may be imposed.

46.The answer to the first question is, based on the officer’ evidence – I cannot be sure. The 
answer to the second question is, based on the officers’ evidence, I find that a protected 
characteristic appears to have had a significant influence on PC Thorogood’s decision
making. As I have found above, I cannot put out of my mind that it was actually what you
stood for and your beliefs that acted as a principal reason for the stop and acted as a 
significant influence on PC Thorogood’s thinking and decision making. This is based on his 
evidence and that of the other officers. I am unsure if the “true and dominant purpose” fell 
within the powers conferred by Schedule 7.

47.In light of my findings the prosecution has therefore failed to satisfy me so I am sure there 
was no unlawful discrimination. Based on that, if the decision to stop and examine you was 
not in accordance with the statutory purpose, it is not lawful and I cannot convict you of an 
offence under para 18(1)(c).

48.I therefore find you not guilty. "

It's curious these court docs are being held on a vulnerable system like wordpress!
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/R-v-Stephen-Lennon.pdf

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...