We often hear this from leadership lately.
The alleged attacking side laughs it off. But this is a terrible mistake.
Why? Because it is true that one side is attacking the other with the prospect of existential threat and death.
Now, you know by reading this channel never ever to take anything I say prima facie. I am not the law. I am doing analytical psychology at a collective scale.
Let's look at the language being used by the attacked side of the collective, who we can assume are the left and the woke. (everyone else being the attacker)
- Attack: it is true, their 'world' is under attack and is facing genocide
- World: it is true, this world was created by them and belongs to them and is more important than anything else, even their own descendants - Power
- Extinction/Genocide: it is true, if they do not respond adequately, their world will be destroyed
This 'destruction' - back on the earth, is merely that they will no longer be in power. This is no small trifle, it is everything to them. Everything. The earth will of course shrug it off no problem.
When you look at the political scene in terms of the collective psyche, the objective facts are laid out for all to see with great clarity.
So what's the problem? All leadership treats these objective facts of the collective psyche, as 'mumbo jumbo'.
And so it goes.
This isn't to say the left and the woke are not clinically mentally ill in large part. It is to say if you do not treat them as if they are, you will never be able to understand what they mean, will not make any way and havoc will inevitably ensure.