Skip to main content

Obedience to the Tribe: You're a Heretic if You Do Not Subscribe to a Political Tribe

There is the Left versus Right thing - where politics seems to demand you are one or the other. 

I have always said "both are wrong". And often get attacked more than if I feigned support for one of the other. 

This is because a person being obedient to a tribe is honoured more by a competitive tribe than someone who shuns all tribes.

Both left and right wing tribes automatically sense this heresy and treat you as the most dangerous kind of political actor, if you shun every tribe equally. Left and right wing tribes are really 'the same' tribe at the root. And the battle is an internecine one. Both differ only at the margins. 

This is because any tribal actor knows obedience is what matters first - status within the tribe. Not the tribes hallowed principles. Obedience to the tribe and its authority. And particularly submission to the hierarchy. Think about how apes are socially - that is a perfect exposition of human social organisation. Often the leading ape is killed by the royal court when they want to climb and have found the power to do so. 

Whats amusing psychologically is when some, especially the left, claim they are doing it for moral reasons or because it shows an evolutionary advance. I must be careful here of not supporting the right more than the left! Its just an example. The right do it to - same kind of thing, different form. 

Even tribes which have hated each other for decades, will join forces against any outside voice which openly refuses tribal obedience. Remember the original Planet of the Apes film?

This is why you see deep and long term and often impenetrable rivalries say in Ireland, now suddenly joining together against open borders.

All governments know this very well indeed. And use it as a tool for control of the great masse, at scale.

Orwell described it very well in 1984 (in 1948!). The state understands it, teaches it to its members, and uses it to 'attack' even its own tribal people - to maintain control, because it works. 

Don't be fooled when they say this is for you own good. This is a classic psychological and binding lock, known as virtue laundering - a bad act = good intent. And moral licensing - a good deed = free pass for bad.

Authority gains control, at scale when it can say this - “I’m good, so my bad is okay.”

Thanks to Grok here

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...