What If the Democratic Majority Are Insane?

We constantly here calls now asking why there is so much terror in the West. So much corruption by its leadership. And so must injustice from its so called rule of law.

I cannot answer that question, except to say that when the people themselves have sunk to new lows, the people who lead them will soon follow close behind.

So what if it's true that the majority of people of a nation are systemically corrupt and unjust?

I don't mean all people or everything they do is unjust and corrupt. I do mean have we crossed a threshold, where so many of us are, that there's going to be no stoping the injustice and corruption - too many people uphold the injustice and corruption.

Is it all being done in the name of the people, with wealth and power merely following our lead?

It's no use saying "well I'm not corrupt or unjust, it has nothing to do with me, its them over there". You are not the democratic majority who in the final analysis, decides. And when the waves are lapping at your door what will you say then? The waves are lapping!

Topping that it does not even have to be a majority who decides. It just needs to be a collective group of people large enough to swing power. That might be as low as 10% of the electorate. Especially if the electorate is systemically selfish, ignorant and lazy, which is highly likely.

This is why its been so easy for medieval political gangs masquerading as religions to gain large tracts of power across all pillars of state.

Do not worry. If it only takes 10% to swing it one way, it only takes another 10% to swing it back. And in the unlikely event that weak and obedient white men decide finally to act like honourable and strong men it will be all over in days.

I do not believe it will be that easy. The people on the whole, especially weak and obedient white men are too large in number. It will run and run until the cold civil war already under way turns hot.

And then the nation will be restored. But at enormous cost.

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states. Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

North Stoke Life

Search This Blog