Skip to main content

Digital/Voter ID Makes it Near Impossible to Steal an Election

 


This is why the main 4 uniparty's in the UK have abandoned it. This is why the US President is insisting on its wholesale adoption.

It becomes nigh on impossible to steal an election if your identity is linked with your vote using a digital signature. Because using this everyday tech your signature is immutable. (cannot be reversed nor repudiated). Not even the state can tamper with a 256 bit hash quickly enough and at scale, to undermine an election *

And with further simple digital tech, and without impeding your privacy at all, your vote can be proven to have taken place. (Zero Knowledge Proofs)

The slave states of the world are not smart. They are slow. And why would a slave try hard at anything if no extra salary will be gained by it? Despite all this degeneracy these states have have finally recognised the truth in this allegation and the 'benefits' of control through obedience which come by abandoning Digital ID or Voter ID. 

From primary evidence in the past 3 US elections, about to be exposed big time if the judges do not manage to censor it the following indictments have just been issued:

"Barack Hussein Obama attempted to overthrow the United States government in 2016, the sitting president in 2017, overthrew it in 2020"

* Of course there are other ways a crooked state urgently looking for armies of wilful slaves to exploit can tamper with votes. But with a digital signature EVERYONE will be able to see it has happened. 

And that means insurrection, in the clear black and white which a small child can quickly see.

My personal addition to all this, is that if digital technology is used to secure an elections integrity, votes in the form of transactions must be archived on a public blockchain(digital ledger) for all to see if necessary. 

Not to see the identity of the voters or impede their privacy, that's impossible technically. But to hold the authorities securely to account by its transparency. Reinforcing the second amendment just as the right to bear arms does so well.

See here for the full Grok conversation.


Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more