Skip to main content

Mind Control is a Myth

Only you can give permission to someone to control your mind. You do this willingly and freely. Even when threatened with force you still make the final decision. 

The mechanics of your submission to a Master like this are that someone tells you what to believe. And you go on to believe it. You still don't know if it is truth. You just agree to believe it. Often contrary to what you already know. 

That was your choice in totality.

No one else or no power in this universe, that we know of, can change your mind against your will. You are the only one who can do it.

Your choices are entirely a matter for you to attend to. They belong to you and only you. Your choices may coincide with identical choices of others. But that is random coincidence, as far as anyone knows.

The phrase 'controlling your mind' is a bad way to think about it though. It's a common myth. You are the sole controller. And you can prove it without doubt scientifically and emotionally. If someone has changed your mind that's a figure of speech - you changed it because you chose to believe in what they want you to believe. You still did it.

You can lie about what you choose to believe and the lie was still your choice.

Even God cannot change your mind for you. If he could that would break his oath of freedom with you and the universe and he would lose all credibility.

My hypothesis - if he even exists, is that God does not want your obedience contrary to all religious power structures. It's obvious why Power wants you to believe in this right? 

He wants your autonomy, not your obedience. He wants you to choose from your own self from what you know. Belief to him is irrelevant. He wants you to know. If you move against him on this, then so be it, but then you're on your own in the universe. (I presume)

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...