Skip to main content

In Every Age Beliefs are at War with God

We all have to be on constant guard, against beliefs, 

Beliefs are not truth, they are beliefs,

We all swear by our belief, protecting and nurturing it like a child,

So why this urgent warning?

Every tribe has its own belief system, a narrative which binds the tribe,

Follow it and go far, deny it and be sent into exile,

The belief dominates the tribe above all else,

Every tribe has its own dominant belief, it's everything for the tribe,

When two beliefs collide, we're instantly in danger,

Two tribes, are now in conflict,

The motive for believing is protection given by the tribe,

My tribe closes ranks to protect me from other beliefs,

But choosing to reject all beliefs is a lonely place to be,

The need for social comfort is great, the desire to belong irresistible,

People are willing to boost the death toll of their own people,

Rather than to escape the belief,

The excess death toll is the price we pay for the comfort of beliefs,

Thats' not to say that beliefs have no utility,

It is to say, that in every age, beliefs are at war with God. 

Notes: I do not believe in God. I have no religion. Do you understand?

<SNIP> 

Would Jung say that God is an archetype?

Yes—but with an important qualification.

Jung would say that the human psyche contains an archetype of God, or more precisely an archetype of the Self that commonly produces images and experiences of divinity. This archetype represents psychic wholeness: the integration of the conscious personality with the much larger unconscious psyche.

He was not simply saying, “God is imaginary.” Jung carefully distinguished between:

  • God as an ultimate metaphysical reality, whose existence psychology cannot prove or disprove.

  • The God-image within the psyche, which psychology can observe through dreams, visions, myths, symbols and religious experience.

For Jung, the God-image is psychologically real because it can transform people, overwhelm the ego and organise an entire life. Whether that inner image corresponds to a genuinely transcendent God remains a philosophical or theological question.

His typical position could therefore be paraphrased as:

Psychology cannot establish what God is in himself, but it can establish that humanity encounters powerful, recurring images of God within the psyche.

Jung often connected this God-image with the archetype of the Self, but he did not regard the two concepts as straightforwardly identical. The Self is the psychological concept; “God” carries metaphysical and religious claims extending beyond psychology.

Applied to your image, Jung might interpret “humanity at war with God” psychologically as the ego rebelling against the Self: conscious humanity resisting the deeper moral, spiritual and integrating authority arising from within the total psyche. The conflict is perennial because every age is tempted to make its own power, reason, technology or ideology absolute.

Popular Posts

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to address the disconnect in UK leader...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...