Skip to main content

The Quiet Abandonment of Vael’thara


On the high plateaus of Vael’thara the wind still carries the scent of the old cedar forests, though fewer of us walk among them now. I write this from a settlement that was once a market town and is now a place people pass through quickly, if they can. The elders who remain call it by its proper name; the newer arrivals have begun calling it something else, shorter and harder in the mouth.

We were not conquered. No fleet darkened the sky. No army broke the outer gates. The ships simply kept coming, year after year, and the people who stepped from them were not interested in the old songs or the old laws. Many of them said, plainly enough among themselves, that the plateau folk were soft, that their temples were empty, that their young had stopped having children and preferred the comfort of the silver stipends the central halls still issued every month. They were not wrong about the last part.

For two generations the native clans had grown fewer. The numbers were kept in the old counting houses; anyone who wanted could see them. Births among the plateau families fell until the halls were half empty. At the same time the work of the lower terraces and the river docks passed into other hands. Those hands belonged to people whose own clans, far to the south and east, still filled their longhouses with children and who saw no reason to adopt the quieter customs of a people who no longer filled their own. In the river towns the markets changed language first, then the street names, then the hours when certain squares were simply not walked by anyone who still spoke the old tongue. No decree forbade it. People simply stopped going.

The high seats in the central halls filled, slowly, with voices that had arrived in the last thirty years. Some were competent. Some were not. Almost all of them spoke of the plateau as a place that needed to be remade rather than continued. When a few of the remaining clan speakers objected, they were told the objection itself proved the decadence the newcomers had already diagnosed. Most of the objectors went quiet after that. They returned to their houses, took the monthly silver, and kept the shutters closed.

I have spoken to some of those who still raise children here. They do not argue. They look at the empty places where their own brothers and sisters once stood, at the changed squares, at the new prayers rising from the lower terraces, and they say nothing. Silence is safer. Silence still receives the silver. The ones who left the plateau entirely are called wise by those who remain; the ones who stay and speak are called bitter.

The root is not the ships. The ships came because the gates were open and the watchers had grown tired of watching. The root is the long turning away: the preference for ease over continuity, the decision that the old forms were too costly to keep, the quiet agreement that someone else could tend the terraces and the counting houses and the outer roads. When a people stop filling their own houses, other peoples will fill them. That is not invasion in the old sense of banners and burning. It is simply the ordinary movement of life into spaces that have been left unguarded.

Some among the remaining clans still speak of reconciliation. They mean a reconciliation between those who still wish the plateau to remain what it was and those who have already accepted that it will not. I do not know whether that is possible. The children being raised now in the lower terraces will not remember the cedar scent the same way. They will not hear the same names for the winds. They will not need to. The silver still arrives each month for those who stay quiet, and the ships still come.

What happens after the last of the old counting houses closes its doors is not a mystery. It has already happened, quietly, in every district where the native families grew too few to keep the squares.

Popular Posts

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to address the disconnect in UK leader...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...