Skip to main content

Is the State Really a Corporation?



Making myself abundantly clear, I am a big fan of corporations. I'm simply asking, is the state the same thing, fundamentally as a corporation?

Thats to say, the state provides services, its clients the people pay for them.

Now, the thing is, clients pay by taxation and taxation is an inherently unjust social institution. And are there any other payment channels used by the state to collect fees?

Taxation is paid based on clients' ability to pay it. So they might receive free services if they're unable to pay it. Or pay too much for services they do not receive. Or a million iterations on between.

What is the difference between the public and the private sector. I say these two terms are fabrications, or visionary rumours, used to help people escape from a basic reality - that theres no such thing as a public or private sector - there are only corporations.

And what the great masse believe to be the public sector is just the biggest corporation or the business with the largest monopoly power and biggest private army no doubt.

An analogy that might help observe this idea, is to think about street gangs or even more organised versions like the mafia and organised crime. Can you seriously think of any real difference?

The gang promises to protect you (hopefully, maybe, probably not). in exchange for protection money, in the form of taxation. Or they could more simply steal the people's savings by spending new money into existence to buy stuff with. Whatever, do you see the point?

A corporation is always aiming toward monopoly power, as a primary duty, it might always get there before going bankrupt or falling. And the biggest monopoly of all is to be able to hold elections and make the law with impunity. And this privilege is only available to the one with the biggest army. 

This idea us harder to analyse. Because the great masse of people 'need' a powerful and despotic father figure of master - to protect them. People do not on the whole believe in or want genuine freedom because its too risky. Much easier to form a tacit alliance with a master and be a slave, knowing you will get the protection you prefer... maybe. Probably not. 

So this idea of a public and private sector in perpetual competition for rail, health, military, infrastructure services, really is a childish fantasy.

Both are illusions used to escape from the basic reality that we select the best gang leaders to rule us and willingly though reluctantly cough up a very high prices in protection money.

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...