Skip to main content

I Am Anti Society

Have you considered what this means before jumping to a conclusion well programmed by society?

Does it mean I'm anti government or anarchist?

Does it mean I'm anti state or anti King?

What I mean is that SOCIETY IS INHERENTLY UNJUST, as a way to organise humans.

Lets take a quick look at is primary institutions:

Taxation, as a way to fund itself, confiscates it's constituents hard won earnings. Could there be a worse source of funding than stealing by force with this systemic theft. It makes the incentives to commit crime, legion. It causes war. And is root cause of poverty, the wealth divide and bankruptcy.

How about the law, where the one who tells the best story is innocent, and the other guilty. Notwithstanding the facts. And once society has monopolised the law, what is left for justice?

And health. Well we saw in 2020 how systemically corrupt that is and need say no more, except that most healers stay out of or are prohibited from entering the business, by society?

What about democracy, societies method for selecting it's leaders. Well to start with, it's a poor organisation which needs leaders. So democracy boots itself up from a broken starting point. And after all, democracy is neither good nor bad for humans. It is what the humans within it, make of it. And all a perfect voting system can do is reinforce societies inherent injustice - once society has become corrupt the worst always rise to the top.

And education, which tells us from birth how to uphold all these other systemic scam institutions?

There are more. Society only seems to be able to create unjust institutions with which to run itself. So I am anti society.

You may well then ask, what is my policy?

If you still need to ask this question, then you are still a slave within the society which supports you as a slave.

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to indicate countries of the UK are open to accede to the US

Sign the Petition A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious con...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...