Skip to main content

A Review of The Global Collapse of 2026

Fred Speaks well in this piece. The Global Collapse of 2026

But with all due respect to the great man, he goes nowhere near far enough to make the slightest bit of difference. A fundamental change in the way we think about the world is needed. And how on earth is that ever going to happen?

CAVEAT: I'm not saying there'll be a world war. I am saying a war is inevitable if we do not change direction, no matter who is responsible. Unless we can find the strength to stop judging others - projecting, no matter who they are, where they come from and what they believe in, nothing at all will change. If we can find the strength, very much is immediately possible and this is the goal this post is asking you to consider. It will be very hard for you to consider it, because all of us have such heavy and deeply hidden bias, most if us are not even aware of.

And no one is willing to make that change, when people can tell by intuition the easier solution is the slaughter of a hundred million from the global south, to bail out the governments of the world who, as Fred correctly states, are too big to fail

And the people, not wealth and power will be fully complicit. 

If the necessary change in some people can be made, what is the first step in this change? 

It is for us to end the pathology of 'jealousy of wealth'. A doctrine which quickly helps us to point our finger at wealth and power in a spectacular escape from complicity. If we cannot end it we will never enter an authentic dialogue - we will have 'escaped' that opportunity. I'm neither left nor right wing. But the left have been making significant ground on this over the past 30 years. It's not that the left are horrid people. Its that this kind of escape is a terrible mistake. 

Here's my review of this excellent Youtube piece by Fred:

Yet is Trump repressing the American people too? Evidently not. But note that nothing was said about the oppression of UK people for speaking up about the non left wing kinds of hurty words and faux protesting. Its not to complain about the left. It is to say that the world is infected by a duality, and that this ideology is currently winning the crushing of the world. Anyone who is not on the left will eventually cycle around and be the next perps winning the worlds death. So childish. 

It's curious that Fred, being one of the best forecasters, and who I think is correct about there being a coming great recession, is still trapped in a bi-polar political world. Yet speaks so well about how that attitude is causing most of the problems - a projection maybe, we all have them? 

He's totally correct on the uselessness of protesting but has conspicuously missed out that protesting is an escape for the people who already decided not to change and want to keep their rents - the protestors are merely a proxy for the great masse of people who want rent seeking as the fundamental basis of every economy, to proceed, in spite of the hundreds of millions who may have to die for that free choice. Clearly the people do not not care about our children.

So, on a "mass movement for this change", this movement already exists, is already informed well enough and already feels liberated about exactly what to do. (watch the protestors, crooked NGO's, wokeness, corrupt media, DEI hiring, and Uni's, all at a systemic level, and everyone else's fear of speaking against their grotesque doctrines for perfect evidence making matters that much the worse). 

Everyone is involved in this. It belongs to all of us no matter what we believe or how poor we are. We created this world, it is ours. But the is no one who will confess to this. And because of that no leader will make a stand on it. 

And the people are already applying the necessary democratic pressures from that 'liberation'. This liberated movement has already delivered what we have right now, and yes, even the people at the bottom chose this. 

I've tried telling people about LVT for 20 years. Its been clear people understand it well enough to easily make the necessary change - but they do not want it, knowing very well the inevitable consequences. Those who do not understand it yet, if they give you the time to tell them, they too reject it immediately, even more fiercely than they do mass migrationvaccine mandates and the growing sexual degeneration and sexualisation of children. 

I don't agree with this collective 'people' attitude at all. I'm simply pointing at it in the hope wisdom might finally prevail with great people like Fred. Because he has the energy and skill to take an important message to the people - but it must be the right message which opens a door. Rather than the message as a door no one ever knocks on. 

So, the MP's already have their mandate right here - it is what we have now. This is not a counsel of despair. It is making a call out for anyone who wants to commence a more open dialogue, unlimited by any of the judgements Fred is still making that cause the system wide failure of dialogue still. 

And the idea that convergence is the thing making it unmanageable is still not enough, being just an iterative activity not a fundamental change. Its that we are not looking at the world as a whole and free from judgement. If we cannot do that, nothing will happen. Likewise for his thing on AI. 

This dialogue, free from judgement, takes in the clear and present pathologies and psychopathies of the great mass of people, as a collective, today - that is to treat The People as a unit with a life of its own, but is very sick indeed. That way judgement of the individual can be avoided and the resulting resistance obviated. Ready for a dialogue about The People as a unit urgently needing medical help. I asked Fred about this 15 years ago in a London restaurant while eating lunch with famous Hollywood socialists. And he poo pooed it as mumbo jumbo. 

Obviously this means those partaking in the dialogue must first look in the mirror and assess themselves as nationalists or patriots and maybe some other unconscious forces from the depths to see in what proportion of these we act as individuals without realising it. I'm not sure if Fred has ever got that far yet and he's a very old man now. 

This is not to say be more or less of anything, or one way is better than the other or abolish the one we like or do more of the one we hate. Its simply to audit oneself with authenticity before entering the dialogue, else nothing important can happen. 

No one can escape this and no one is really aware of how they act in this respect until its audited properly, especially me. But I do recognise myself doing it and know I must work on it. 

If we cannot cross that frontier and enter this forbidden zone, nothing new will be happening and Fred's hopium of "just getting people to say we want to stop the rent seeking Mr MP" is no better than those lesser than him are trying to persuade us of. 

I agree there are cold wars already under way in each nation. Civil wars between those groups of people trying to stop the migration and those trying to intensify it. 

If this escalates as he suggests and I think is possible, the only result can be the slaughter of millions from the global south to bail out the governments who are too big to fail. Or at least enough of them to rescue the system. 

But it's really 'we the people with the ultimate power', a a unit, with a life of its own, which is too selfish and ignorant to try something risky and new, to enter into a dialogue with the whole of the world, and without judgement, who will be root cause of this next global slaughter. We.

Fred can helped here if he rises above the usual earth bound form of debate. And says to himself, "I am".

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...