Skip to main content

There Is No Such Thing As a Border, Open or Closed

Both sides in this destructive duality which always ends up in conflict, are neurotically self hypnotised and causing harm to our descendants. This is how both sides are thinking:
  • Closed borders - support the closing of something that does not exist
  • Open borders - support the opening of something which does not exist
A border is not a fence or a wall. Those things are fences and walls, which exist materially, and are not borders. 

A border is a piece of paper with ink on it saying that Power will either allow or disallow something. That is all. POWER.

Power can only function if the subjects of it are obedient to it. If the subjects are autonomous actors Power is nothing. Most of the history of society is an exposition of the subjects being obedient instruments of authority. There is a smattering of autonomous  subjects. So to solve the worlds great social problems a good strategy might be to encourage more autonomy. 

The curious thing is Power does not own this border it's trying to give or take away in the first place. It's only able to allow or stop subjects passing across something that does not exist and which it has never owned. 

It's no use saying "well the law has granted ownership". Well thank you for reinforcing my point even more intensely - the law is just another arm of Power, allowing or disallowing something it does not own and is just pieces of paper with ink on them - it is not inherently justice in and of itself. 

So, both sides in this political battle over if the border should be open or closed are seeking Power and that is all. 

Both sides are masquerading as being here to save you. Both sides really want your obedience. Neither side wants your autonomy. If you are seen seeking unconditional freedom you will be sent into exile, a virtual death sentence. This is why most subjects seek obedience over autonomy - they are weak and will not be honoured by our descendants.

Both sides - or shall we start calling them tribes, have hypnotised themselves into believing a story that is not happening in the real world - the story that borders actually exist. 

The hypnosis means they are no longer aware that they're both obedient instruments of authority seeking power and nothing else. 

If a nation truly cares about its descendants more than itself, it will stop talking and imagining about opening or closing borders, recognising that borders do not actually exist. 

What will be their policy then I cannot say. But at least both sides will not be killing so many of our descendants generations before they are born. 
Labels:

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...
Read more

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado - The 2026 Great Recession

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle always culminating in a financial crisis and great recession. The 18.6 year astronomical period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this and had been measuring it for aeons. And the politicians of the time used it to name the day when the economy had to be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because they noticed around 19 years is as long as an economy can survive when being unjustly abused by its people. Any longer making it too late to recover on its own. And without the reset much worse effects emerge. They knew this. They did not know why. They j...
Read more

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...
Read more