Friends & family is a far cheaper and more effective way to run a nation.
The point is, that nothing is free. If everyone else pays for those they have no connection with it will end up in systemic fraud. This is not an opinion. It is observed.
And for people who I honestly believe need help, I will help and pay for them to get it, to the best of my ability. Won't I?
When a light is shone on me, to suddenly say that 'I' cannot afford it is a telling signal. With welfare, I already pay anyway when everyone else pays for it. Am I not 'everyone else'? Or how is it that theres more more money available when I'm not paying for it directly?
When my friends & family duties and obligations are thrown onto the state the costs are always double, triple or more, due to the inevitable scam it always ends up as. Where we all take our 'bag of silver' for not discussing it in public. Do we not?
So friends & family is a principle way of resisting obedience and aiming for autonomy. Call it a form of personal transformation.
It's my view politically, this is how a nation should be run, through friends & family. Sure, there are still outliers who need our welfare.
And are these not a tiny proportion of the nation and can we not allow the state to safely deal with that, even at a loss, small as that may be?
Friends & family is a far cheaper and more effective way to run a nation.
.jpg)