Skip to main content

Re-Migration Will Increase House Prices & Rentals and Trigger an Economic Boom



Re-Migration Will Increase House Prices & Rentals With an Economic Boom. This is A Good Thing. 

We appreciate very much what you are doing to save the nation. And it's essential the administration understands this - which it may well do already, so that it is ready for the significant effects of this boom well ahead of the game. Which I forecast will be bigger than the tariff so far, also an excellent policy.

Before we move on, we should consider this is a good thing economically(in spite of the political fabrications that will surely follow it). 

This post is not trying to say re-migration is a good or bad thing in and of itself. It is saying that economically there will be a boom if it happens, not a regression.

Now you understand my motives for posting this let us move on to the technical detail:

The assumption that large scale re-migration will reduce rents and house prices is a technical mistake economically. This is not how real estate prices and rentals work exactly. Though I fully understand your purpose to market it like this and I have no problem with that.

By removing so-called bad actors from a location, at scale, means the value of that location will certainly rise. 

This offsets the effect on prices of the new supply of rentals that are now there.  

The net effect is to increase the rents and selling prices, overall. 

Exchanges of real estate function differently to the exchange of goods and services. Because the market knows to make the most out of it, it must speculate on real estate as an asset. 

It does this by bidding up expected future higher prices due to the present new improvements. People are not paying what a location is worth today as they do with goods and services, but what they expect it to be worth way into the future. 

And this speculative effect always outruns the simple supply and demand mechanics.

It's important to understand this as an administration. If only so that you're ready for the economic boom which is likely to follow, ahead of the game. 

I'm sure the President would be delighted to hear this being a real estate expert. I am no expert politically so I do not know how it fits into his program. 

The key point is that rising rents are a clear signal a nation is improving - the best signal of all. And declining rents are a signal the nation is in decline generally. You do not want to signal that rents are falling, it is a mistake politically. There are 130 million home owners in America each with two votes in each home on average. 

I hope you understand. By all means call for clarifications. 

Popular Posts

PETITION: Government to Indicate Countries of the UK Are Open to Accede to the US

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the United Kingdom, it would end their system of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy . Instead, if they joined the United States as separate states, they would govern themselves under the U.S. federal system while receiving its protection. This proposal recognises that immediate change is unlikely but urges a serious conversation to addres...

Facing Draco, Mining Dorado

This is a proposal to show how the 18.6 year real estate cycle is a hang over from times where the mechanics of the lunar month were used by high priests of the time to forecast ancient agricultural cycles - what we would today call a business cycle culminating in a financial crisis or a great recession. The 18.6 year period is governed by the intersection of lunar and solar eclipses. It is known scientifically as the Saros Cycle. Where all 3 harmonics of the orbit of the moon coincide once every 18.6 years. The ancient scholars knew this. And the politicians of the time used it to signal the day when the economy would be deliberately reset by fiat. This reset was necessary because this period was about how long the people of nations could abuse the economy before it was too late to recover on its own and much worse effects would have emerged. So it was the wisdom of the leadership of the time. As the aeons went by, the meaning and rationale of this policy became normalised - people an...

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview?

Who Said There Was Anything Wrong With a Worldview? I didn't. But it's when I believe my worldview, is truth, that I become violent without realising it. This is extremely hard for people to accept as possible. The resistance to seeing it and the temptation to escape from looking, is built into its foundations. So, I never said worldviews are bad for us. I did say that when I believe my worldview is a fact, then "I" become root cause of the worlds problems. Thought creates an image of the world. Then thought worships the image that thought created. I am scared of death. So I create an existential worldview about immortality - an image. This can be a God, a political ideology, scientific religiosity, atheism, planet saving activism, anything which my fear of death can hide behind. So if I do 'good' through this image I created, I will ultimately get a 'seat on the right hand side of God' , or whatever the image I created has defined as heaven. Then I w...