Skip to main content

Craig Wright, Bitcoin, the Power of the Narrative and Winning

Imagine The situation where a tribal narrative has power over large groups of people. 
  • Remain obedient to the narrative and you will be rewarded. 
  • While not being obedient to it will see them send you into exile.

Do you want to win or do you want to lose? 

I don't mean that you must obey the narrative per se, to win. I mean do you want to win or do you want to lose? 

If you want to win, you must appear to be following the narrative and supporting it. If you want to lose you must visibly oppose the tribe and its narrative and they will send you into exile as punishment, to lose.

If you insist on moralising and using your intellect and reading books, you will lose. That, is not obedience to the tribe. Is that the approach of a wise man?

Being wise does not mean obedience. It means observing what is happening and not allowing ones worldview( your Master) to lead ones thought.

A wise man will be obedient to the narrative nominally but will not be obedient to everything about it in what he does. This is okay because the tribe only looks out for or sees what is said not what is done.

This is so obvious among the competing Bitcoin tribes. It means there's absolutely no risk to doing whatever you want to do or need to do to get your job done. Which I believe you can do very well. There's no need even for patent protectionism. It's all safe. They don't care what or how you do it. They care how you say it.

There's no risk that they will send you into exile for what you do. There's no risk they will steal your ideas. None. So just do it, without telling them you oppose their tribe. That is all they care about and act upon. Do not waste time and money on patents. In the end state actors will just take it from you anyway if they see it has merit.(The SBR and rescuing the dollar)

And there is every risk if you are talking and saying what is right and wrong about it, if, it runs counter to their tribes narrative. Then they will crush you by all means. Look at how Trump is dealing with his own tribal wars. Not altogether perfectly. But his narrative is presently stronger so is still winning. And look at the fallout from it - huge excess deaths not by Trump, but by tribal obedience all round.

The narrative - what people say, is everything to people. What one actually does means very little to people. There is no risk of losing anything from what you actually do? Whereas there's every risk from what you say. 

This is the power of narrative. Narrative, is power. Held by the people it protects. It's no use blaming leaders and the wealthy or the present winners - it's the people who respond to the narrative. Winning is conferred onto the winners by the people being protected by that narrative. If you're a loser it simply means the people are conferring nothing onto you.

We can see perfect exposition in the UK's Green party right now as they're buying up votes by the million by speaking with promises about lucrative welfare packages and speaking nicely about the poor. Yet they are obviously crazy and are clearly exploiting the immigrants brutally to buy their votes. But at least they understand the power of the narrative and are winning by that means. While Restore Britain is getting a paltry number of votes with 'sensible' policy about what they will do, they have nothing much to say to the people which stimulates their narrative as powerfully as the greens. Sick and demented as this all is, it works! And they are winning because they understand how it works and the eventual losers do not understand this.

What is said is what matters not what is done. People obey power based on what is said not what is done. People obey their own tribe's narrative first and foremost. What is done is not relevant to people. Power is relevant to people. People are power. The narrative is power.

I do not agree with this. I'm simply observing it happening in front of my face. I want you and Bitcoin to win. But you are losing because you are not on the winning side of the narrative. This can change immediately if you so choose. And you and Bitcoin then have a strong chance of winning.

Do you understand?

Popular Posts

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States (UKEXIT)

A Dialogue on the UK's Accession to the United States Executive Summary This initiative seeks to foster a formal dialogue regarding the potential accession of the countries of the United Kingdom , to the United States , as individual states.  Being English the main focus is for the country of England to accede. The original intent was to ask the government to lead on it through a petition leading to the question coming before the House of Commons. This was crushed out of hand by the committee leading petitions, which was not a surprise.  Simply put, this petition is asking the government to start a conversation about the benefits of leaving the UK and joining the United States. Let us call the initiative UKEXIT (yukezit) The objective is to evaluate the benefits to citizens and stakeholders, encouraging a constructive discourse on the political, economic, and social implications of such a union. If Wales , Northern Ireland , Scotland , or  England were to leave the Unit...

The 450 Volt Truth: From Orwell to Obedience

A Complete Thread on Dystopia, Milgram, and Breaking the Agentic State - Why People Act Irrationally and Often Violently When a Tribal Social Structure and Its Hierarchy Are Brought Under Serious Scrutiny This is a tricky topic. Please read the Obedience Glossary of Terms before proceeding Executive Summary This piece was written from a long conversation with Grok. I had to interrogate the AI quite a bit. And was astonished at how it produced such intelligence. I've included the most pertinent parts. Do not be fooled into thinking this is just another Orwell analysis. That is just setting the scene well. For what comes later on the agentic state and how power uses it to control the masses.  It may not have all the answers. It might wrong. A lot of it is very hard to believe is happening. But it still seems to fit the bizarre world of system wide dissonance we all live and partake in today, better than all the alternatives. So deserves your continued attention. By all means make yo...

Government & Tax Death Toll

I'm going to show you how government and taxation causes more excess death than any other factor, even global wars and pandemics. It is and always has been the biggest genocide of all. And its deliberate. Government doesn’t just fail to save lives — it takes them, at scale.  2–6 million globally 200K–400K in the U.S. 50K–80K in the UK Every year. Every tax. Every regulation. Cumulatively since 1970 government and tax killed between 160 and 300 million people across the globe  More than all 20th century wars and genocides combined (260M) In the U.S. ten times more than all U.S. combat deaths in history (10 * 1.2M) In the UK equivalent to 1 in 15 of all deaths And the nations with more regulations and a higher tax to GDP ratio such as the UK and US, tend to kill more of their own citizens per capita. The poorest nations have a better record than the richest. All this excess death is rooted in the institutions of taxation - the theft of private property, by force, against your fr...