.jpg)
Because it knows that if it goes to the root of British problems, it will be unelectable.
This is standard establishment approach. It is the approach of all party's.
It would be far better for a person's personal development NOT to vote at all than to vote for any of them. Because they would remain authentic as a person to that extent.
Even if one person were to do this, that would be the start of an authentic movement for the people...at last. That person, by giving up their prior life, will have saved it. There is no prisoners dilemma here(a fallacy most people worship, especially the intellectual).
Proof?
Look at Mr. Rupert Lowe. He claims to be a farmer. But he's 90% a landowner and 10% a farmer. If he were to truly go to the root of the nation's problems, he would need to ask about why taxation falls only on EARNED incomes. And not on UNEARNED incomes.
Immediately he would be unelectable for a generation. Because all of us without exception want the unearned incomes - the goodies, more than we care about the future of our children or what will happen to us when we die. So, establishment.
And taxation of earned incomes kills more people than all other causes combined except abortion. (I'm apolitically pro choice BTW, that is, against the state having anything to do with it. Suicide too)
This is not a personal attack on the man. It is simply, observed, free from judgement. It is happening. And he is no worse than all the rest. He is the same as all the rest.
Next look at his primary policy: 1) the immigration voter infiltration scam and the child rape gang pervert cover up. No doubt these things are both yet more systemic and grotesque exploitation of the poor and vulnerable as per normal from the state we all vote for. But bad as they are they are still nowhere near as harmful and exploitative as taxation of earned incomes and privatisation of unearned incomes, which he fully supports. So, establishment.
Sure, he talks about dealing with taxation. But only a teeny weeny little bit. Like all the others. Again, establishment.
Yes, he talks about going after benefit scrounging in both the public and private sectors. A sort of British DOGE - dealing with a devastating money laundering scam and unjust redistribution of wealth through fraud and crime. But still stops way short of the big problem. Establishment.
No doubt dealing with all these smaller problems would improve the nation's productivity no end.
But all these things are still all DOWNSTREAM problems. And while the biggest UPSTREAM problem is left unattended it will only leave more in productivity for the robber who takes all that is left. If you improve productivity by removing problems yet leave the biggest problem unattended, the biggest problem will simply soak up all the gains.
This is what causes many people to incorrectly diagnose the so called wealth divide which has always been this wide - if you do not go to the root it will feel like its impossible to narrow the gap, so, devastating policy is carried out with impunity(huge excess deaths) must be the only way to deal with it. A sort of psychopathic collective pathology.
It's no use saying "well at least he's doing something about it and all the others are not". 1) that is what all the others say equally, purest establishment thinking. 2) you still trying to escape from dealing with the final most powerful robber among us 3) it's also an escape from doing your duty as an authentic citizen of Britain, that is, supporting any party which is not authentic is by implication anti Britain.
Yes, I do realise we are approaching a majority in the nation who are indeed anti Britain, even if you don't count the voter infiltration scam. But that is no reason to accept the shame and guilt of not having defended your own country for the past few decades. Nor indeed to teach your children to accept the same guilt and shame.
Restore Britain is Establishment. Just like every other party. Will they change and become an authentic opportunity for Britain?