All of them should be abolished. Immediately.
Law cannot treat human rights. Because law is rules made up by a collective of people.
What is 'just' is not something an unconscious collective can deal with. It is unconscious!
Only the autonomous individual is awake.
Behind every social problem, lies a social wrong.
An individual is not a part of society but themself.
Society forms when the individual has given up their duties and obligations in the world, in exchange for unjust collective rights and the law.
And I quote:
"Robinson Crusoe, as we all know, took Friday as his slave. Suppose, however, that instead of taking Friday as his slave, Robinson Crusoe had welcomed him as a man and a brother; had read him a Declaration of Independence, an Emancipation Proclamation and a Fifteenth Amendment, and informed him that he was a free and independent citizen, entitled to vote and hold office; but had at the same time also informed him that that particular island was his (Robinson Crusoe's) private and exclusive property. What would have been the difference? Since Friday could not fly up into the air nor swim off through
the sea, since if he lived at all he must live on the island,
he would have been in one case as much a slave as in the
other. Crusoe's ownership of the island would be equivalent to his ownership of Friday."
Likewise for an immigrant today. The state could give them an unowned home, benefits, free health care, citizenship and human rights beyond that of the indigenous population, sanctuary from prosecution, and particularly the vote and so on and so on. What good would that do them if they do not own any of this new found land on which they must live? Whoever owns that land, by implication, must own the immigrant and whatever wealth they can produce beyond what's needed for them to remain alive and well enough to place their vote to retain all of this.
They must be de facto slaves, whatever else you wish to call them. The ownership of land gives all the power of ownership of people, in more convenient form - that is to say - Rent.
"Had chattel slavery continued, some similar device for the ownership and management of slaves would in time have been adopted. But by changing the form of slavery-by freeing men and appropriating land-all the advantages of chattel slavery can be secured without any of the disadvantages which in a complex society attend the owning of a particular man by a particular master."